Both articles that I read talked about how important it is for the RtI process to be timely in order to better serve our students. Screenings need to occur within the first weeks of school. These screenings need to be done in order for a plan to put into place to serve the student. The general education and special education teacher need to work together to form the best plan possible for the student. With more people watching and helping the better off the student will be. If something is not working then the interventions may need to be adjusted to better suit the needs of the student. It is an on going process that will grow and change with the student.
After reading these articles, I have determined that we use the RtI practice a whole lot more than I realized on my campus. I teach Head Start and we must screen all of our students with a screening tool within the first 45 calendar days of school. The tools lets us know if they are considered greatly at risk, at risk, mildly at risk or not a risk. Based on this tool we determine what we need to do for each student. At the end of the first six weeks of school we meet with our administrative team and discuss any concerns we have about any children in our class and how they scored. If we have a special ed concern we then fill out paperwork and start the process of a referral. On the other hand if we have a student that we feel needs more time to adjust to school and more support we continue and monitor. We repeat this process of meeting and discussing our students each six weeks. To me this sounds a lot like the RtI process we just have not been calling it that. I agree completely with the articles in that the process benefits all students not just students with special education needs. We are prime example of what early intervention can mean for students.
An important idea that I took away from this article is that we need to have our plan in place and make sure that we have all members of the team on board to support our students. We have some good practices in place, but I feel like we could refine our process to be more proactive. Waiting six weeks to bring concerns forward could be late for some. I think we need to get a plan in place for documenting our students that we want to continue to watch to see if we need to refer or not. We do a great job with the students who need the referral. We get them started and receiving services as fast a possible.
"RTI is not a program you can buy. It is not a pathway to special education. It is a method of organizing and coordinating school resources to create a more efficient range of options that serve all students in danger of not reaching their potential." (Searle, M. 2010). I believe that this quote sums up what RtI should be in our schools. It is a way that we can make sure that we are serving all students to the best of our abilities and giving them the support they need to succeed.
Oliver, B. and Rutherford, P. (2010) Response to Intervention (RtI): An Idea Whose Time Has Come. Just Ask Publications & Professional Development.
Searle, M. (2010) What Every School Leader Needs To Know About RTI. What is RTI and Why Should We Care? ASCD publications.
http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/109097.aspx
http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/109097.aspx